The Greensward

On April 22, and 23, 2022, the Department of Records and Information Services will commemorate the 200th birthday of Central Park architect Frederick Law Olmsted with a pop-up exhibition featuring the original Greensward plan. Submitted by Olmsted and co-designer Calvert Vaux, the master plan won the Central Park design competition in 1858.

Rarely seen in public, the Greensward plan is considered a masterpiece of 19th-century landscape architecture. The story of its creation begins in 1852 when the city’s Board of Aldermen formed a Special Committee on Parks. The Committee proposed to build “The Central Park” in the rectangle bounded by Fifth Avenue, Eighth Avenue, Fifty-Ninth Street, and 106th Street.  

Map from Greensward Presentation board no. 2., 1858. Department of Parks and Recreation Drawings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives

The two-mile-long by half-mile-wide 778-acre plot, with its rocky outcrops of Manhattan schist rising above stagnant bogs, and home to nearly 1,600 people, was a challenging site for a park. On June 21, 1853, the State Legislature authorized the mayor to issue stock, known as the Central Park Fund, to compensate the 561 owners of the more than seven thousand lots that comprised the future park.  

Delays arising from purchasing the property and political wrangling over a plan for the park delayed further action until October 1857, when a new state-appointed Board of Commissioners announced a formal design competition. All planners were instructed to incorporate specific requirements into their presentations: at least four transverse roads, a parade ground for military drills, a two-to-three-acre formal flower garden, three playgrounds for “healthful exercise,” a site for concerts and exhibitions, a prominent fountain, an observation tower, and a winter skating area, as well as “at least one institution of cultural uplift or practical knowledge.” The budget was $1.5 million. The March 1, 1858 deadline for submissions was moved back a month when the requirements were expanded to include specifications and costs for building roads and preparing the land.  

Greensward Presentation board no. 5., (view of the Lake from Vista Rock),1858. Department of Parks and Recreation Drawings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Well-connected English-born architect, Calvert Vaux, and the Connecticut-born writer, surveyor, clerk, and farmer, Frederick Law Olmsted were casual acquaintances but shared a belief that nature had the power to uplift and refine the human spirit. Vaux suggested they collaborate on a design. The new partners worked nights and weekends through the fall and winter of 1857-58. Vaux’ son, Downing, remembered that the drawings needed “a great deal of grass to be put in by the usual small dots and dashes, and it became the friendly thing for callers to help in the work by joining in and adding some grass to Central Park.”

Preparations continued to the last possible moment. Arriving at the Arsenal Building late in the evening of March 31, 1858, Olmsted and Vaux had to wake a caretaker to deliver their proposal, only minutes before the deadline for entries. Logged in under the name “Greensward” as Entry #33, it was brilliant in presentation and bold in design. Their large-scale master plan was executed on high-quality paper mounted on linen; their two texts,  the Description of a Plan for the Improvement of the Central Park “Greensward” and Particulars of Construction and Estimate, were professionally printed by William Cullen Bryant & Co.; and their twelve presentation boards featured a mix of graphite drawings, albumen prints and oil sketches related to particular views, some accompanied by a lithograph of a map to show its location.

Presentation board no. 4, detail, (view across the Lake toward Vista Rock). The “present outlines” view, attributed to the studio of photographer Matthew Brady, shows fields bordered by a stone wall, with Vista Rock rising in the background to a lookout tower. Department of Parks and Recreation Drawings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Presentation board no. 4, detail, (view across the Lake toward Vista Rock). The “effect proposed” view, painted by Vaux’s brother-in-law (Hudson River School artist Jervis McEntee), shows the fields have been replaced by the Lake, rising to a landscaped hill topped by an early version of Belvedere Castle. Department of Parks and Recreation Drawings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

With monetary prizes being awarded to the top four entrants, the commissioners were hopeful that proposals would arrive from leading European experts in park design, but they received only two foreign entries and those were of little distinction. The entries were arranged for viewing in rented offices at 637 Broadway, along with summaries of the written components of the submissions. On April 28, 1858, the commissioners made their selections. The grand prize of $2,000 went to Vaux and Olmsted.  

Olmsted and Vaux believed in creating “scenery” that appeared to be natural, and that the park “should present an aspect of spaciousness and tranquility, with variety and intricacy of arrangement, thereby affording the most agreeable contrast to the confinement, bustle, and monotonous street-division of the city.”

They named their plan “Greensward,” a word that means ground covered with green grass. Visitors today can easily observe how the designers reserved large areas of the park for pastoral scenery with open greenswards bordered by shrubberies and groves of trees, often with nearby open water to reflect foliage and give a feeling of depth to the landscape.  

Presentation board no. 9, detail. The “effect proposed” shows Bogardus Hill (now known as the Great Hill) with a Monumental Tower. Department of Parks and Recreation Drawings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

The Greensward plan has long been recognized as a work of genius. The Olmsted and Vaux traffic circulation system separating walkers, horseback riders, and carriages, and the sunken transverse roads, are often considered their most innovative concepts. The plan is also notable for its inclusion of lakes and ponds. The successful installation of these features proved their mastery of landscape design on a grand scale.

The Greensward plan accepted by the board was seen through to completion, with one significant change. As the design competition played out, a consensus developed among the commissioners to extend the park to 110th Street. The additional area, filled with steep rock formations, spring-fed swampland, and thick vegetation, seemed a natural part of the park, and the cost of grading the rocky terrain to incorporate it into the city street grid would have been exorbitant. In April 1859, the board requested that the state legislature approve the purchase of the additional sixty-five acres, along with a budget to provide for construction. It took until 1863 to settle the eminent domain disputes over the property valuations.

Presentation board no. 2, detail, (view toward ball field and Umpire Rock). The “effect proposed” shows a pavilion for visiting spectators (never built) sits on Umpire Rock, while ballplayers take the field in the foreground. Department of Parks and Recreation Drawings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

The Department of Parks displayed the Greensward plan in the Arsenal, their headquarters in Central Park, for many years. In 2015, the original plan was transferred to the Municipal Archives and a high-quality replica took its place in the Arsenal.   

Read the full story of the Olmsted and Vaux collaboration and creation of the Greensward plan in The Central Park, Original Drawings for New York’s Greatest Treasure, by Cynthia Brenwall, and plan a visit to the Municipal Archives on April 22 or 23 to examine this extraordinary artifact.

Open for public viewing, free timed tickets are required to ensure safety. Tickets are available for 30-minute visits on the following dates: April 22, 2022 - 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. and April 23, 2022 - 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Use this link to sign up for your free tickets:

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/celebrate-olmsted-bicentennial-the-greensward-plan-for-the-central-park-tickets-288125680667?aff=ebdsoporgprofile

Fay Kellogg, Architect

“For the Record” introduced the  Manhattan Building Plans Project in 2018, and provided an update in April 2020, In the Details. This important work is continuing. With funding from the New York State Library Conservation and Preservation Program, two more staff have joined the project. To date, the team has completed processing almost 40,000 plans.

Surrogate’s Court, 31 Chambers Street, central atrium and staircase, 2018. Photographer: Matt Minor. NYC Municipal Archives.

Recently, they inventoried an 1897 alteration plan submitted to the Department of Buildings by architect A. F. Leicht for a hotel located at 270 South Street. According to the application, a “Mrs. Emma Meyer” owned the building; notable because a woman-owned business property at that time was very unusual.

This led to wondering about a related topic, women architects. Reviewing the inventory of the processed plans revealed exactly one building with a woman, Marie Frommer, listed as the primary architect on a 1946 building alteration plan. One goal of the processing project is to provide multiple ways to research the collection: location, date, and architect’s name. The inventory also includes the landmark status of the building, quantity and condition of the plans, as well as remarks, e.g. exceptional façade elevation, or, “woman-owned.”  

Continuing the search for woman architects led to an excellent resource, Architects in Practice: New York City, 1900-1940, compiled by James Ward for the Committee for the Preservation of Architectural Records in 1989. The preface to the volume included a list of architects with “feminine” names. It’s a short list. Of the more than 5,000 names in the directory, Ward identified a total of twenty women. 

Would the Archives collection provide information about any of the women architects on this list? The answer is yes, and the journey led unexpectedly close to home, and the fascinating story of Fay Kellogg.

Since 1984, the Municipal Archives has been headquartered in the Surrogate’s Court building at 31 Chambers Street. Designed by John Rochester Thomas in 1899, the Beaux-Arts-influenced structure has long been celebrated as one of the most beautiful public buildings in the city.  

First floor rotunda, detail, Hall of Records, 31 Chambers Street, architect John R. Thomas, 1897. NYC Municipal Archives.

What is less well-known is that Thomas’ staff included a young woman architect named Fay Kellogg who is credited with the design for the grand staircase that is one of the highlights of the central atrium.

Piecing together the history of a person often requires many sources. In the case of Kellogg, it is fortunate that she was written about during her career. Those contemporaneous reports supplement the archival records needed to tell her story. Born in 1871 in Milton, Pennsylvania, Kellogg attended Columbian University, now known as George Washington University, in Washington D.C. to pursue a career in medicine. In a 1907 article in the New York Times entitled, “Woman Invades Field of Modern Architecture: Remarkable success of Miss Kellogg in profession exclusively followed by men scores triumph for her sex” Kellogg explained that her father had concluded that the study of medicine was long and difficult and urged her to give it up. Instead he offered to pay for her to study architectural drawing and mathematics with a German tutor followed by a year of study at the Pratt Institute.

After her initial training, Brooklyn architect Rudolph L. Daus hired Kellogg in 1892 to help design the 13th Regiment Armory and the Monastery of the Precious Blood. She also spent a year with the firm of Carrere & Hastings before heading to Paris. While working at the atelier of Marcel de Monclos she applied for admittance to the Ecole des Beaux Arts. Had she been successful, she would have been the first woman at the Ecole. And it was through her petitions to the French government that the Ecole began accepting women students in 1898.   

295 MacDonough Street, Brooklyn, 1940. Tax Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

After Paris, Kellogg returned to Brooklyn. According to census records, she resided with her family at 295 MacDonough Street. The 1910 federal census records her occupation as ‘artist,’ but the 1915 King County census (available in the Municipal Archives) more accurately lists her profession as ‘architect.’

A 1915 story in Pearson's Magazine, “Two Women Who Do Things,” by Kate V. St. Maur, described how Kellogg joined the architectural firm of John R. Thomas, designer of 31 Chambers Street, and stated “… the great staircase in that building was designed by her.” The 1907 Times story related how Thomas had also approved her plan for a sculptural program made up of four early Dutch governors placed in niches that would “represent them looking out on the Greater City, with its skyscrapers, subways and other features of its wonderful growth.” Sadly, Thomas died before construction began and the work was turned over to the Tammany Hall architects Horgan & Slattery who scrapped her plans for the sculptures.

After Thomas’ death in 1901, Kellogg went into business for herself, with an office at the newly-built 30 Union Square. She started off quickly with a commission to renovate and construct seven buildings for the American News Company in Manhattan on Park Place. They soon placed her in charge of all their work in New York City.

Throughout her career, Kellogg designed hundreds of buildings, cottages, suburban railway stations, and helped to design the Woman’s Memorial Hospital (now the Interfaith Medical Center) in Brooklyn. During World War I, Kellogg was one of three female architects, including Julia Morgan and Katherine Budd, who were contracted to design “hostess houses” for military camps in the South.

“Woman’s Place Is, if You Insist, in the Home; but Who’s Going to Fuss About It If She Wants to Earn $10,000 Or So, a Year, Somewhere Else?” Illustrated article, New York Herald, December 17, 1916.

In addition to her work, Kellogg strongly supported women’s suffrage and the fight for the equal rights of women in the workplace. In 1909, she was included in a delegation of “self-supporting” or professional women, the only architect included in the group, invited to sit on the stage at Carnagie Hall to hear British Suffragist Emmeline Pankhurst. She often spoke eloquently about the role of women in architecture. For example, in a 1911 interview with The Cincinnati Enquirer, Kellogg was asked if there were any specific fields suitable for women in architecture, to which she replied, “I don’t think a woman architect ought to be satisfied with small pieces, but launch out into business buildings. That is where money and name are made. I don’t approve of a well-equipped woman creeping along; let her leap ahead as men do. All she needs is courage.”

In 1907, Kellogg purchased property in Greenlawn, Town of Huntington, Long Island. She built a home there, as well as the town post office. On April 21, 2021, Town of Huntington officials unveiled a historical marker honoring Kellogg, describing her as “…the foremost woman architect of the early twentieth century.”

Fay Kellogg, death certificate, no. 14819 of 1918, Brooklyn. NYC Municipal Archives.

Kellogg became ill in Atlanta, Georgia in the spring of 1918 while supervising the construction of hostess houses at Camp Gordon. She died in July 1918 at her home in Brooklyn, aged 47. According to her death certificate (on file at the Municipal Archives), the cause of death was asthenia from a sarcoma of the spine, and not the flu epidemic, as has been more recently reported  The certificate also recorded her occupation:  architect.

Kellogg was not always credited for her work. It is not clear how many other women worked in architectural firms without being acknowledged. By presenting this information, it is hoped that Kellogg’s contribution to the glorious 31 Chambers building will be recognized.  

Honoring Women’s History Day, Week and Month

From 1977 to 1991, New York City Councilmembers Miriam Friedlander, Jane Trichter, Ruth Messinger and others frequently used the cable television station Channel L to advocate for the rights and welfare of women, as well as celebrate the history and ongoing activism of women in the City. Channel L was the public access channel assigned to the City of New York by (Sterling) Manhattan Cable Television as part of the franchise agreement MCT signed with the City in the late 1960s. Hosting episodes of the call-in talk show, ‘Manhattan at Large,’ these Councilmembers invited guests to discuss salient and evolving issues in women’s lives, such as job discrimination, domestic abuse, politics, sexual orientation, and homelessness, to name just a few.

The first Women’s History Day was held in New York City, February 28th, 1909, organized by the Socialist Party of America and corresponded with rising action to achieve women’s suffrage in the United States. In the following years, the celebration evolved into International Women’s History Day, observed every March 8th by feminist, Socialist and labor organizations around the world. By 1978, both New York City and the United Nations officially recognized International Women’s History Day and the United States declared March as Women’s History Month in 1987.

REC0072_0136_excerpt March 3, 1982. Channel L Working Group Collection, NYC Municipal Archives. Diane Lacey (board member of the NYC Health and Hospital Corporation) and Connie Kopelov (Coalition of Labor Union Women) comment on the importance of knowing women’s history and what it does for them personally.

The recognition of International Women’s History Day in 1978 came one year after the pivotal 1977 National Women’s Conference in Houston, chaired by New York Congressional Representative Bella Abzug. Tens of thousands of women from across the country attended the conference and created a report that was later presented to Congress and the Carter administration. The report, titled The Spirit of Houston, included a National Plan of Action detailing reforms and new policies meant to improve the lives of women in the United States. The many topics covered in the report included: education, minority women, employment, domestic abuse, healthcare, an Equal Rights Amendment, insurance, homemakers, older women, sexual assault and reproductive freedom.

REC0072_0013_excerpt March 15, 1978. Channel L Working Group Collection, NYC Municipal Archives. The devaluation of work traditionally done by women was one of many topics discussed at the National Women’s Conference.

The importance of such a conference was underlined by the stark realities women faced in the United States in the late 1970s, and still face today. One topic that Councilmember Friedlander returned to repeatedly on her Channel L program was the plight of battered women and efforts to reform laws around domestic abuse. Frequently, law enforcement officers and courts treated domestic violence as a family matter to be handled internally, rather than a criminal assault that necessitated serious legal penalties. Over the course of her time in City politics, Friedlander successfully pushed for a significant expansion of shelters and services for victims of domestic abuse.

REC0072_0027_excerpt July 26, 1978. Channel L Working Group Collection, NYC Municipal Archives. The ongoing tolerance of domestic abuse has been a primary example of the way in which women are treated as second class citizens, despite significant reforms.

Although abortion had been decriminalized in New York State in 1970, it wasn’t until 1973 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v Wade that abortion was essentially legalized throughout the country. Even with this new legal status, it was estimated that hundreds of thousands of women were still unable to get an abortion throughout the 1970s. This was often due to inadequate facilities where they lived, forcing them to make long and burdensome trips to obtain safe and reliable healthcare. This remains a major problem almost half a century later and one that primarily impacts already disadvantaged women.

REC0072_0129_excerpt January 13, 1982. Channel L Working Group Collection, NYC Municipal Archives. Despite abortion rights being consistently supported by large majorities in the United States, it is an inherently difficult topic to discuss and therefore organize around.

In 1937, Genevieve Earle was the first woman elected to the New York City Council. Representing Brooklyn, she became involved in politics in 1907 as a municipal researcher and was a leader in the local suffragist movement for many years. Four decades after her election, Councilmembers like Miriam Friedlander traced their own work for women’s rights back to this era, drawing not only on the inspiration Earle had provided, but also the hard-won legal rights the suffragette generation had achieved. As of 2022, roughly four decades after these television programs were broadcast, for the first time in history, the majority of the New York City Council is made up of women. Still, it is important to appreciate that women’s history extends far beyond any one place or time and that no one organization or group of government officials has an ability to define or claim ownership. The same can and should be said of women’s hard-won legal rights.

The New York City Municipal Archives recognizes the critical role that women have played in our City’s history and is committed to the preservation of records that document that history. We hope that the conversations recorded in these videos and many others in the Channel L collection will inspire  current and future generations to honor the achievements of those who came before and strive for a better future.

The Historical Vital Records of NYC

The Department of Records and Information Services launched Historical Vital Records of NYC this week. The site features more than nine million birth, death and marriage records, all freely available to browse, search and download. In less than 24 hours after the launch, people from across the globe—in Europe, United Kingdom, Australia, China, New Zealand, Argentina, Jamaica, Hong Kong, Fiji—to name just a few places, visited the site.   

Family gathering in Queens, n.d. Borough President Queens Lantern Slide Collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

The Municipal Archives has always endeavored to use advances in technology to expand and facilitate access to its vast holdings. About ten years ago, DORIS leadership began promoting the benefits of digitizing the historical vital record collection. Their arguments were persuasive and funding was made available beginning in 2013.    

“Friends of China” Parade in New York City’s Chinatown, December 1937. WPA Federal Writers’ Project Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

It was an incredibly layered undertaking that involved setting up the financial, physical and digital infrastructures to support the long-term project. In the first phase, Assistant Commissioner Kenneth Cobb procured contracts with eDocNY, a New York State Industries for the Disabled vendor, to digitize the records. Cobb led a team of technologists, database managers, digitization technicians, metadata creators, collections managers, preservation and conservation staff, to ensure the project’s success. 

The vendor eDocNY produced excellent high-quality, full-color scans of the certificates—a vast improvement over the microfilmed images previously available. The digital image helped to improve accuracy in transcribing the records and provided another opportunity to engage with genealogy partners who, since 2003, had been indexing the collections from microfilmed and hard-copy sources.  

The next phase was to make the new digital records available to a broader audience.  In 2017, DORIS launched an application built by in-house developers that allowed reference staff to fulfill requests for vital-record copies more efficiently and accurately using the new color images. The vital-records application also provided onsite patrons with the ability to search and view the records. The “app” was a pivotal steppingstone.    

Michael J Mahoney Park, n.d. Department of Parks and Recreation Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

Once the digitization project with eDocNY successfully digitized more than eight million records, DORIS pivoted to digitizing the Marriage License series in-house. Over the past several years more than one-million records have been digitized, preserved, and made available. The project was interrupted during the pandemic and picked up again in August, 2021. This work is on-going.  

Further, City archivist Patricia Glowinski has begun working on a comprehensive guide to the New York City vital records, documenting records created and/or maintained by the City of New York, and vital records created and/or maintained by municipalities that were once located within the boundaries of the present-day five Boroughs that were dissolved or annexed before 1898. The collection includes birth, marriage, and death registers, certificates, and indexes, and marriage licenses, 1760-1949 (with gaps).

On the steps of a school, n.d. Municipal Archives Collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

The agency’s application development team tested a variety of open-source approaches to making the vital records available in a timeframe that internet users expect. They built a robust, secure, easy-to-use platform, capable of handling a large volume of users simultaneously. As a result, on day one, more than 25,000 users accessed the site and downloaded 12,000 records.   

With each step, access to the collections increases, and the Municipal Archives continues to build and sustain industry-standard plans to manage the physical and digital collections, and the associated descriptions that provide access points. It is to the credit and expertise of archivists, conservators, and reference and research professionals at the New York City Municipal Library and Archives, that these collections will survive for future generations, and continue to enrich the research experience of people and communities around the world.   

Family in tenement kitchen, n.d. Municipal Archives Collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

Stay tuned for more announcements! 

The “Remembered Way of Doing Things,” Minutes of the Court of General Sessions, 1683-1962

The Municipal Archives collection of records pertaining to the administration of criminal justice have been described as the most comprehensive in the English-speaking world. They date back to the 17th century and include a variety of materials such as minute books, docket books, indictment papers and case files created by the criminal courts and district attorneys. 

A series of blogs are planned to describe these records and provide guidance on how to conduct research. This first installment focuses on one of the oldest series in the Municipal Archives, the Minutes of the Court of General Sessions. Future blogs will examine the court and criminal prosecution records of the Dutch colonial period, records of the lower criminal courts, and records created by the district attorneys.  

Minutes of the Court of General Sessions, volume 1, 1683-1687. Original volume from the collection of the New York County Clerk’s Division of Old Records.

Until its consolidation with the Supreme Court of New York County in 1962, the Court of General Sessions was the oldest continuing court of criminal jurisdiction in the United States. The court organization had been brought over by English settlers to the New York colony as part of the “. . . remembered way of doing things.” (Martin L. Budd, “Law in Colonial New York:  The Legal System of 1691,” Harvard Law Review 1967, Vol. 80, page 1764.)  Its origin dates back to fourteenth-century England when the traditional justices of the peace were required to hear more serious offenses in meetings held four specific times a year which came to be called general or quarter sessions. 

When the English rule of New York City was re‑established after the Dutch occupation for a year in 1674‑5, Sir Edmund Andros, the English governor, reconstituted the city government, giving to the mayor and any four of the aldermen power to hold a court of sessions. In 1685, a permanent law officer, called a recorder, was authorized, who thereafter sat as part of the court. Formally established by the Judicial Act of 1691, the Court of General Sessions had jurisdiction to try felony indictments.

Criminal jurisdiction continued with little change after the Revolutionary War. In 1787, a statute directed that in New York City the mayor, recorder and aldermen, or any three of these, of whom the mayor or recorder had to be one, composed the Court of General Sessions in and for the City and County of New York. Meetings were held on the first Tuesday in February, May, August, and November of each year, and might last eight days. 

The Court of General Sessions existed in New York County (Manhattan) only. The court tried felony indictments before a petit jury. The definition of a felony changed over time, but generally included crimes such as burglary, homicide, grand larceny, felonious assault, robbery and perjury. General Sessions also heard appeals from lower courts (Police Court, Magistrates’ Court and Court of Special Sessions). A case was brought before the Court when a grand jury agreed that the district attorney had presented sufficient evidence that a crime had been committed and signed a bill of indictment. 

The adoption of this basically English institution established such rights as trial by jury and the use of the grand jury as part of New York’s legal system beginning from the late 1600s. In its basic forms and procedures, the court remained relatively unchanged over the next three centuries. In 1962, the court system in New York City was reorganized and the Court of General Sessions became known as Supreme Court—Criminal Branch.         

The Minutes of the New York County Court of General Sessions provide a summary record of the court’s proceedings. For each day the court was in session the minutes record the names of the presiding justice, prosecutor, defendant, defendant’s counsel, and jurors. The record also states the charge, defendant’s plea and outcome of the proceedings.   

Beginning in 1840, as the number of cases increased, the Court divided itself into “Parts,” as follows:

  • Feb. 1683 ‑ Dec. 1839, 60 vols.             

  • Part I, Sep. 1840 ‑ Nov. 1919, 211 vols.   

  • Part II, Feb. 1873 ‑ May 1919, 59 vols.     

  • Part III, Mar. 1887 ‑ Apr. 1920, 35 vols.  

  • Part IV, Jan. 1896 ‑ Jan. 1920, 28 vols.   

  • Part V, June 1907 ‑ Apr. 1914, 6 vols.      

  • Part VI, Oct. 1914 ‑ Feb. 1921, 5 vols.     

Minutes of the Court of General Sessions, February - December 1836, Index page “E” and “F” names. NYC Municipal Archives.

Researchers should note that this series is not a transcript of trial proceedings.  Trial transcripts were generally made only if the case was appealed or if the defendant paid for one. Trial transcripts from the Court of General Sessions from 1883-1927 are available from the Sealy Library at John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY).      

The Minutes from 1683‑1922 have been microfilmed and are available for research in the Municipal Archives. The minutes after 1922 are hard-copy only and available for research at the Archives’ Industry City, Brooklyn, location.  

How to Use the Minutes of the Court of General Sessions. 

Each volume of the Minutes contains an alphabetical index by name of defendant.

This makes the intellectual content of the series relatively simple to access.  

The search for documentation of the case against Henry Faulkner, and others, accused of conspiracy, will serve as an example. With advance knowledge of the 1836 time period (from newspaper accounts), it was quick work to find the relevant entries.  

The People vs. Henry Faulkner, and others on indictment for “Conspiracy,” plead “Not Guilty,” Minutes of the Court of General Sessions, March 18, 1836. NYC Municipal Archives.

The People, etc. vs. Emma Goldman on indictment for unlawful assembly, Minutes of the Court of General Sessions, September 11, 1893. NYC Municipal Archives.

The People, etc. vs. Emma Goldman on indictment for unlawful assembly, Minutes of the Court of General Sessions, September 11, 1893. NYC Municipal Archives.

As noted above, the Minutes provide, in summary format, the essential facts of the prosecution for a felony offense; e.g. date of indictment, date(s) of court appearances, and the jurors’ verdict. But perhaps the greatest value of the Minutes is that the date of indictment information can be used to conduct research in the several felony indictment papers series created by the courts and/or District Attorneys. These series are almost always arranged by date of indictment. They document, sometimes in fantastic detail, all aspects of a prosecution from the first appearance in the lower criminal courts, through the final verdict. They often include witness testimony, correspondence and other relevant documentation. 

The Minutes of the Court of General Sessions are an essential resource. Together with related series pertaining to the administration of criminal justice, they provide significant documentation relevant to the history of New York City. Look for future blogs that describe related series, their significance, and access information.  

If Not Perfectly Clear, Postponed One Week: Invitations of the Gilded Age

Invitation to a Lawn Party to Aid the Peabody Home for Aged Women, June 7, 1890. Early Mayors Records, Hugh J. Grant. NYC Municipal Archives.

Viewers of the new HBO series The Gilded Age may speculate about the veracity of the many plot lines drawn from 19th century New York City history. The New York Times recently published a helpful guide for the curious: “The Gilded Age: What Is Fact and What Is Fiction?” (February 22, 2022). In the article, writer Sarah Lyall examined the “back stories of some of the elements that shape the world of the series.” As Ms. Lyall explains, that world is “…the Gilded Age of our imagination, full of grand families, sumptuous furnishings, lavish entertainments, stringent social rules, massive fortunes and sky’s-the-limit ambitions.”

Invitation to the Fourth Annual Excursion of Ivy Lodge No. 65, July 10, 1893. Early Mayors Records, Thomas F. Gilroy. NYC Municipal Archives.

Among the preoccupations of those at the at the apex of the city’s social scene (or those who wished to be) is the world of charitable functions. To be more specific, who was invited to what charity event (and who was not invited) formed the centerpiece of much the conflict between new and old money New York families that is engagingly depicted in the program.

Complimentary Ticket to the Tournament at the New Game of Billiards at Tammany Hall, November 11, 1879. Early Mayors Records, Edward Cooper.  NYC Municipal Archives.

The importance of these social events resonated with city archivists who remembered seeing invitations and other artifacts of these functions in the Early Mayors’ Records. This series includes correspondence and documents from New York City mayoral administrations from 1826 through 1897 and totals 157.5 cubic feet. The collection had originally been assembled by Rebecca Rankin during her 32-year tenure as the Director of the Municipal Library between 1920 and 1952.  This was a core collection in the Municipal Archives when it opened in 1952 and remains one of the most important series documenting nineteenth-century government and policies. The Early Mayors' Records finding guide is now available online.  

Invitation to the First Annual Summer Festival for the Benefit of the Immigrant Girls Home, August 13, 1891. Early Mayors Records, Hugh J. Grant. NYC Municipal Archives.

 Two blogs in 2020, The Transcription Project, Early Mayors’ Collection, and

The Transcription Project, Early Mayors’ Collection II , discussed how archivists, working remotely in 2020, transcribed descriptive materials that enhances access to the intellectual content of the series. Researchers will be able to more easily identify the invitations and other artifacts of the social scene, such as the samples reproduced here.   

Invitation to the Grand Annual Excursion of the Mohawk Association, August 13, 1890. Early Mayors Records, Hugh J. Grant. NYC Municipal Archives.

Another theme, thoroughly exploited for dramatic purposes in the series, are the interactions between political leaders and the business community. The invitations to social, fraternal and other functions found in the mayor’s papers (many marked ‘complimentary’) are just one manifestation of this enduring fact of New York City life during that era.  

Invitation to the Grand Annual Pic-Nic for the Benefit of St. Mary’s Literary Institute, June 7, 1880. Early Mayors Records, Edward Cooper. NYC Municipal Archives.

Invitation to the Family Excursion of the Property Owners Association, July 22, 1897. Early Mayors Records, William L. Strong. NYC Municipal Archives.

Here are a few examples. Today we can appreciate them for their artistry, color, and typography—evocative of the ‘Gilded Age’ in New York City—and as artifacts of a world long-gone. 

Invitation to Grand Annual Ball of the Legion of Justice, March 9, 1891. Early Mayors Records, Hugh J. Grant. NYC Municipal Archives.

Program, Metropolitan Opera, January 24, 1891. Early Mayors Records, Hugh J. Grant.  NYC Municipal Archives.

Program, Metropolitan Opera, January 24, 1891. Early Mayors Records, Hugh J. Grant.  NYC Municipal Archives.

Hat Check for the Tough Club, February 21, 1890. Early Mayors Records, Hugh J. Grant. NYC Municipal Archives.

Knights Temperance Invitation, September 16, 1890. Early Mayors Records, Hugh J. Grant. NYC Municipal Archives.